Most Popular Posts
Categories
- Biodiversity (58)
- Climate change (130)
- Community-based conservation (78)
- Economics and conservation (126)
- Endangered species (186)
- Fresh water (41)
- Habitat (192)
- Invasive species (82)
- Marine (100)
- Monitoring (218)
- Restoration (138)
- Socio-political issues (145)
- Tools and technology (91)
Archives
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
Apr
30
2008
Protected areas don’t always protect as well as they should, study reveals
Conservation projects often hinge on areas of land being given protection, but little is known about how well many protected areas actually do their job. Studying four of the world’s major moist tropical forests, a group of Duke University researchers led by Stuart Pimm found that inaccessibility can be a tree’s best friend. Protected areas within the Amazon and Congo forests, for example, nestle within largely well-forested surrounding areas, which keeps them relatively safe. The Atlantic Coast and West African protected areas, by contrast, are more fragmented: unfortunate, given their status as biodiversity hotspots. The study, published this week in PNAS, nonetheless throws welcome light on the way that large scale conservation initiatives work, or don’t. Source: Joppa LN, Loarie SR & Pimm SL (2008) On the protection of “protected areas”. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0802471105
Image © Joe Gough
Filed Under Community-based conservation, Economics and conservation, Endangered species, Habitat, Monitoring, Socio-political issues |
Email This Post